This situation: If the vehicle never actually came to a halt and was only creeping, the contravention requiring a stop may not be proved. - full question
Did your car ever fully stop with no movement in the yellow box? Or was it always creeping or rolling?
Challenge guidance for this situation
This page explains a common yellow box PCN appeal angle. If the checker brought you here, the guidance below is adjusted using your yes/no answer in the URL. This is not legal advice.
Your draft letter
Replace everything in [square brackets] with your own details. Scroll inside the box if the text is long.
Subject: Representation / appeal: yellow box [PCN number] I dispute this penalty. My vehicle did not come to a complete stop in the yellow box. It was moving slowly or creeping the whole time. The rule requires a stop. If the wheels never fully stopped, the contravention may not be made out. Please review the CCTV carefully for continuous movement rather than a halt. [Date, time, location, registration.] Yours faithfully, [Name]
Guidance for your case
What to do next
You said the car never fully stopped, only crept. Ask them to check frame-by-frame for continuous movement.
Why this can matter
Adjudicators have allowed appeals where CCTV showed perceptible movement throughout, with no true 'stop'. The offence needs a stop.
If it was creep not a true stop, ask them to look for any moment the car fully halts.
Guidance for your case
What to do next
If your car did fully stop, this angle may not help. Try duration, length in box, why you stopped, or video quality.
There is no ready-made letter for this combination. Use other topics in the wizard, or challenge the PCN with your own wording and the council's evidence.